Is Samir Nasri becoming a bit-part player at City?

Samir Nasri’s stock has never been higher than this summer following a great season at Arsenal. The Frenchman was mooted as the missing link to both Man Utd and Man City’s title hopes this campaign. His creativity, movement and quality in the final third are without question. However, what may be, though, is his role in Mancini’s plans, which since the debacle away at Bayern Munich, has been reduced to one on the periphery.

The Bayern Munich game appeared to mark a watershed moment for Mancini for several reasons. While not choosing to ignore the moment that hogged the headlines (and still does) with Carlos Tevez’s apparent refusal to come on as a sub, two sub-plots have also come to light.

Kolo Toure was unfathomably restored to the first-team line-up despite a six-month absence in the place of Joleon Lescott. An error so great that it threatened to put paid to any hopes City had of qualifying out of a difficult group, with the Ivory Coast defender’s ring rustiness notable. The other being that this was the final point in which Nasri’s name became a guaranteed starter on the team-sheet.

Nasri made his debut at White Hart Lane on the 28th August in a 5-1 demolition, with the new signing blending into the squad fantastically well setting up three of the goals in the process.

Against Wigan he came off the bench with half an hour left to play and was integral in increasing the 1-0 deficit. He started the next two games against Napoli and Fulham, with Adam Johnson coming on as a late sub for him both times, before starting their next league game, the 2-0 win at home to Everton.

However, since the Bayern game, in the eight games that have proceeded it, he has started just four of them – against Wolves in both the league and the Carling Cup and against Villarreal in the home and away ties in the Champions League.

He came off the bench after 27mins against Blackburn away from home, was an unused sub against Aston Villa at home, he came off the bench with the job already done against Man Utd with the scores at 3-1 and 15mins left on the clock and was an unused sub against QPR.

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

Since the Bayern game, by which time he had settled into the side superbly and was a regular, he has seen just 347 minutes of football in the next eight games across all competitions. Only 177 minutes have these have come in City’s last five league games. His role has rather unquestionably been reduced, but why?

The recent resurgence of James Milner may have something to do with it. Milner offers industry and a degree of creativity. His all-action style has been ideally suited to difficult league ties against the likes of Aston Villa and QPR.

Whereas the Bayern game may have marked a watershed moment, the real turning point came with Mancini’s preference for Milner over Nasri for the 6-1 humbling of fierce rivals Man Utd at Old Trafford. The shock result of the modern Premier League era.

It appears as if Nasri has now become the first name on the team-sheet for the Man City B-team. Through no real fault of his own and in part because others have grasped the opportunities afforded to them, he has fallen down the pecking order.

Aguero and Silva’s places in the starting line-up appear untouchable. Gareth Barry and Yaya Toure remain for the time being important parts of the Man City machine. There appears to be two spots up for grabs in the long-term – in which four players (Milner, Balotelli, De Jong and Nasri) have to fit into.

Nasri has swapped regular football at Arsenal where a trophy didn’t look like coming any time soon, for a crack at a higher level and a much better chance of silverware. The result has been that’s he’s fallen from a leading light of the Premier League to an also-ran of it’s best side. In an instant, he’s gone from a lead to a supporting actor.

Many felt that Arsenal could ride the blow of Cesc Fabregas’s departure as long as they kept hold of Nasri and installed him as their creative hub. His transfer to City marked a re-aligning in the pecking order – City had finally pinched a player that Arsenal had wanted to keep hold of. Whereas once, he was a jewel in the crown, now he’s little more than a pearl on an admittedly priceless necklace.

Man City do have a large squad filled to the brim with top-class internationals. Mancini will inevitably have to rotate many of them in an attempt to keep the whole squad happy, but it’s noticeable that there have been no injuries in this unusually long sequence of intermittent bench-warming.

Nasri has set up six league goals so far this term, second only to his City team-mate Sergio Aguero. Only at a club such as City would this sort of form fail to guarantee you a starting place. With Mancini’s charges facing a run of Newcastle (H), Napoli (A), Liverpool (A) and Arsenal (A), it will be interesting to see how much he’s involved, for it could hold the key to his Man City future and the nature of the role he has to play in it.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

You can follow me on Twitter @JamesMcManus1

[divider]

 FREE football app that pays you CASH

[ad_pod id=’qs-2′ align=’left’]

O’Neill’s Villa dispute goes to tribunal

Martin O’Neill will head to an arbitration tribunal to resolve a disagreement over his departure from Aston Villa.The 59-year-old left Villa Park in August after four years as manager at the English Premier League club, and the two parties have so far failed to come to an arrangement over the terms of his departure.A statement from the League Managers Association said that because the dispute could not be solved through mediation, it now must be heard by the body’s arbitration tribunal.”It has not been possible to resolve the dispute concerning the termination of employment,” the statement read.”Premier League managers’ contracts contain a clause requiring the parties to mediate their differences in the event of a dispute and, if the dispute cannot be resolved at mediation, that the case moves forward to the Premier League Managers’ Arbitration Tribunal.” “The tribunal is ideally placed to resolve disputes of this nature, combining the skills and experience of prominent individuals from football and the law.” It is not the first time the tribunal has been required to resolve cases like O’Neill’s dispute with Villa.One-time West Ham boss Alan Curbishley and former Newcastle manager Kevin Keegan both had their constructive dismissal claims against the clubs upheld in 2009.

Hodgson proud of Spain pair

Liverpool boss Roy Hodgson has spoken of his pride in having two World Cup winners in the Anfield ranks.

Striker Fernando Torres and goalkeeper Pepe Reina were both part of Spain's successful squad in South Africa.

They will shortly return to Merseyside to begin preparations ahead of the new club season and Hodgson believes that everybody connected with the Reds will be lifted by their achievement.

Fellow Reds Dirk Kuyt and Ryan Babel were part of beaten finalists Holland's squad, while the Spanish 23-man party also contained former Anfield stars Xabi Alonso and Alvaro Arbeloa.

"As Liverpool manager, I take great pride in the fact that two of our players can call themselves World Cup winners this summer," Hodgson told the club's official website.

"Unfortunately, one team had to lose that final and while my commiserations go out to the Dutch lads, I have to say congratulations to Fernando and Pepe.

"Winning the World Cup is the ultimate honour any player can have in international football and you could see what it meant to both players as soon as the celebrations started.

"I think it's safe to say the pictures of Fernando in the dressing room with the World Cup certainly went down well with our fans but the club can be proud of all the players who went away to the World Cup.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

"To have four players reach the final is an incredible achievement and I look forward to working with them when they return to Melwood after their holidays."

Meanwhile, the Reds have confirmed the departures of midfielder Francisco Duran and goalkeeper Nikolay Mihaylov after the pair failed to make the step up from academy to first-team level.Subscribe to Football FanCast News Headlines by Email

Does Villa boss speak for most Premier League sides?

New Aston Villa boss Alex McLeish has lashed out against the “super clubs” who are able to take any players they like from other clubs, given the financial backing and power behind them. McCleish’s comments came about after five of England’s starting eleven against Wales on Tuesday were former Villa players, and with the exception of Gary Cahill, now all play for the ‘super clubs’ who have the financial muscle to lure players away. The likes of Ashely Young who recently signed for Manchester United, Steward Dowining of Liverpool, and both Gareth Barry and James Milner of Manchester City all lined up to face Wales at Wembley, and the Scot insists that these departures emphasise how difficult it is for the other clubs to compete in the long run. According to McLeish, these ‘super’ clubs “are on another planet”.

The Villa boss was keen to reaffirm that the club were not a ‘selling club’, but that fans needed to be realistic in these ‘modern times’. McLeish aim then, is to continue to produce talent at Villa Park that is good enough to break in to the national team. Villa currently boast young English talent in the likes of Marc Albrighton, Ciaran Clark, and Barry Bannan, and while McLeish concedes that ultimately a ‘super club’ may come in and buy them, it is important for the club to continue to produce such talent. Although McLeish’s comments do hold some substance, and it is without question going to be difficult for the ‘smaller clubs’ to compete alongside the likes of Chelsea, United, City and Liverpool, there are one or two exceptions to the generalizations been made, in that a ‘rich’ or wealthy club does not necessarily entail any ‘superiority’, and as we saw with Tottenham two seasons ago, clubs without this kind of financial backing can still break in to the top four of the Premier League.

In the 2009-10 season, Tottenham secured Champions League football for the following season, having pipped big-spending Manchester City to fourth place in the final games of the season. This was the campaign in which City had brought in the likes of Gareth Barry, Roque Santa Cruz, Kolo Toure, Joleon Lescott, Emmanuel Adebayor, and Carlos Tevez in a bid to break in to the top four, while the only players of note that Spurs brought in were Peter Crouch, Niko Kranjcar and Younes Kaboul Spurs finished the season three points clear of City, and enjoyed a successful run in the Champions League the following year before losing to Real Madrid in the quarter-finals.

[ad_pod id=’vip-2′ align=’centre’]

City’s solution the following year was to invest heavily once more, and this time it was to pay off as Spurs struggled to mount challenges on both a European and domestic front, and finished the season in fifth. Spurs’ qualification for the Champions League went some way in showing that money did not guarantee success, especially not immediately anyway. Spurs have also shown us that you do not have to let players leave to the ‘super clubs’ if you really don’t want to. Cheslea were in pursuit of Luka Modric for the majority of the summer transfer window, however both Redknapp and chairman Daniel Levy remained adamant that the Croatian would not be leaving White Hart Lane at any price.

McLeish’s suggestion that money or financial backing entails ‘superiority’ is also contradicted somewhat by the lack of success at Anfield in recent years. Liverpool have always had the funding to bring in new talent, though those players brought in were often not of a high enough quality, and the management in place was also deemed to be substandard for a club of Liverpool’s stature. While the club was generally considered a ‘top-four side’ for a number of years, Liverpool have failed to qualify for the Champions League since 2009 and have finished seventh and sixth in their last two Premier League campaigns. Kenny Dalglish has spent heavily since taking over in January, and for the first time in three seasons this Liverpool side look as though they could be a force to be reckoned with. However, while Dalglish has brought in players of quality, both Benitez and in particular, Roy Hodgson, brought in names that simply weren’t good enough to compete with the top four.

McLeish makes a valid point in that those ‘smaller clubs’ who lack any real financial support or backing will generally struggle to compete with the big-spenders of Chelsea, United, City and Liverpool. However, Harry Redknapp has shown that a top-four challenge can be mounted with the right kind of players, and that quality players do not have to cost the thirty or forty million pounds that these clubs are willing to fork out. Redknapp, and particularly Levy, have shown that key players do not have to be sold. Keeping a player against their will is always a risk, however if they are of as great importance to the club as Modric is to Spurs, it is perhaps a risk worth taking. It seems McLeish could probably learn a thing or two from Levy and Redknapp, and his assumption that money entails ‘superiority’ is not always the case. Good management and the right players is also fundamental to a clubs success and while heavy funding will certainly make things easier, it does not guarantee success nor the ‘untouchable’ status that McLeish has placed on these clubs. Tony Fernandes completed his takeover of Queens Park Rangers back in August and despite a reported net worth of £250m, McLeish will surely fancy his chances when the two sides meet this season.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Agree or disagree? Do Premier League clubs have ‘no chance’ up against the “super clubs”? Let me know your thoughts either below or @sixthofficial on Twitter!

[divider]

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

Montella eyeing return to form

Roma coach Vincenzo Montella is hoping to offset the hurt of their Champions League exit with a win over Lazio in Sunday’s league derby.Montella watched from the touchline as Roma were bundled out of the Champions League by Shakhtar Donetsk on Tuesday, and has instructed his players to win back their fans with a strong performance against their city rivals in the Serie A.It is Montella’s first derby at the Roma helm, though he experienced many in his time as a player for the club.The Italian, who has gone undefeated in Serie A since replacing Claudio Ranieri in February, is expecting a typically fierce and difficult encounter.”I’ve asked my players to face this derby as calmly as they can,” Montella said.”There will be many implications from tomorrow’s match. Of course it’s important for both teams for their position in the table and it’s important for us because we have the chance to try to win back our fans.””That’s why I expect a warm welcome tomorrow. Roma supporters know how to cheer their players on when they want and that’s my hope for tomorrow.””The team understood the mistakes made in Donetsk and is in good shape. Of course we will play to win, as the rest of the games played up to now.””It has been a difficult week, but I think I’ve managed to keep the team calm. Lazio are bound to be the favourites, as they’re ahead of us in the table, but there will be the usual fiery derby atmosphere.””Lazio have an expert coach (Edy Reja), the team is very balanced, they have talented players that are able to make the difference on the pitch and they are a close group.””Lazio has all the characteristics of a dream team. I think the coach should be praised for creating such a group of players.””We are not afraid, I don’t think my players are at all afraid, that’s just something journalists are saying. We are ready for the derby and ready to win it and I’m sure Lazio is the same.”

McSheffrey leaves St Andrew’s

Birmingham City manager Alex McLeish will allow Gary McSheffrey to rejoin Championship side Coventry City when his St Andrew's contract expires in just over one week's time.

The 29-year-old came through the Sky Blues' youth team ranks and scored 53 goals in 157 appearances during his first spell with the club.

He moved to City four years ago but has struggled to become a first-team regular with the club, finding the net 20 times in 78 starts and 18 substitute appearances for the Blues.

McSheffrey ended last term on loan with Leeds United, scoring once in 11 appearances as Simon Grayson's team secured promotion to the Championship.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

McSheffrey has agreed a one-year deal with Coventry and McLeish told the club's official website: "We wish Gary all the best. He did well for us and hopefully he can recapture the form of a couple of years ago when we signed him from Coventry."Subscribe to Football FanCast News Headlines by Email

Steven Gerrard expressed his genuine fear

Liverpool midfielder Steven Gerrard has revealed that he feared that he would never play again, and that the last six months have been the hardest of his career.

The England international has just recovered from a groin injury that has kept him on the sidelines since March, making a scoring return to the Anfield starting line-up on Saturday against Manchester United.

Given the nature of the injury, Gerrard has stated that at times he wondered if he was facing retirement.

“When I got the injury, I knew it was going to be a serious one, something I wasn’t used to – and I’ll admit I was down, as low as I’ve ever been as a footballer,” he told Mirror Football.

“I think it’s only natural that you have doubts. Different things cross your mind from time to time.

“I was fighting to get fit, just to get out on the pitch. I was trying to put my body on the line, but it wasn’t the real me and I wasn’t the player I want to be,” he continued.

The operation that followed was necessary, and was a long time in the offing according to Gerrard.

“Before the operation, I’d been getting niggles and having injections to play. Basically I knew I wasn’t right.

“I was missing training sessions and coming in the day before a game trying to get that last session in, or having injections to play the next day.

“You can only do that for a certain amount of time before your body gives in, and mine gave in. My groin packed in on me and when it happened I was down and I was low.

“It probably wasn’t until I got off the crutches that I started being really positive again. I could see I was progressing day by day, and when that happens your positivity creeps back in. Without a doubt, the last six months have been the hardest of my career,” he concluded.

By Gareth McKnight

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[divider]

So if you want the opportunity to win this fantastic prize on Saturday then click on the banner below – what have you got to lose?

The Pros and Cons of a breakaway ‘Super League’ in football

With our theme of looking into the future of football this week coinciding with the Champions League games, it got me thinking about the taboo idea of a European Super League forming in the future. The Champions League has played a huge part in the expansion of football as a global brand but is part of the progression a formation of a Super League featuring the best teams in the world? Would it be exciting knowing that your team (whether that be Manchester United or City, Arsenal, Tottenham, Liverpool or Chelsea) will be playing the likes of Barcelona, Inter Milan and Bayern Munich twice a season rather than travelling to Wigan and Blackpool? Or would the fans of the latter mentioned teams lose support because there is no visit from the big clubs anymore?

In 2009 Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger said he felt a European Super League could happen in the next decade. With the vast amount of money involved in football, especially the Champions League, you can see why there may be plans on the horizon in in the beautiful game. Just take a look at the reputation of the FA Cup, which has declined since the rise of the Champions League, and the importance to finish in the top four. Maybe in the future, the Premier League might lose the same appeal if the richest/biggest clubs are the only real competitors and the only real competition is from the occasional European games.

I imagine the concept working with a 20 to 24 team league structure full of all the best teams in Europe competing over home and away fixtures throughout a season. There is the possibility of a play-off at the end of the season with the top 4 clubs competing over semi-final and final rounds to determine the European Champions. However, there may be some debate over to which teams qualify as I am sure UEFA would want to include teams from all over Europe rather than fill it with teams from England, Spain, Italy and Germany. So what are all the positives to this possible future proposition for football?

[ad_pod id=’fox-mpu’ align=’right’]

Pros:

–          Entertaining fixtures week in and week out. It will be a showcase of the best teams in the world competing against each other over a whole season, TV deals with clubs will be as high earning as ever and the demand for tickets will see average stadium attendances over the 100,000 mark.

–          Football evolution. In the history books of football there have always been changes to the game so that it progresses and this European Super League will be seen as an improvement to the game as a whole. The days when European Cup football was competed over a knock-out competition will be seen as out dated.

–          There could still be a chance for those breakaway clubs to compete domestically in their national cup competitions.

–          After a few seasons UEFA will be forced to form a European Super League Two to open up more competition with a promotion and relegation system introduced. Eventually more leagues will be introduced, creating a European type pyramid league system.

–          Global club football. The formation of the Super League persuaded South America and Central America to create a similar league structure and the World Club Cup tournament compliments the season.

–          The quality of international football increases with the best players in the world playing against each other on a regular basis.

Personally I would not like to see a European Super League because it would be a change in football for the worse. However, I do believe that it will be formed in the future due to the rich clubs getting richer and the potential in profit that a Super League would create. Although, domestically in England, I believe clubs would still be able to survive due to the love of football in this country. Let’s have a look at the negative points to a Super League…

Cons:

–          The history of football will be changed forever if the Super League was to be created. The league competition domestically across Europe will lose all its foundations and may see clubs going out of business. Might as well rip up the record books and start again.

–          The new Super League persuades clubs to become franchises and those clubs involved will lose touch with their fans for the sake of the clubs ‘brand’. Clubs relocating becomes a trend, players start to reach £500,000 a week salaries with £200 million transfer fees!

–          A breakaway league causes such a divide with the domestic leagues that a divide in the sport occurs. With UEFA’s rules for the Super League no longer recognised by the FAs nationally and FIFA is forced to only accept players from the Super League for international football (Think Rugby League and Union).

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

–          Therefore the clubs competing in the Super League would not be allowed to enter domestic cup competitions or play friendly games with clubs from the national leagues.

–          The pyramid system advances so far that the future European League (five) sees the likes of Wigan Athletic playing Monaco which sets new records for lowest attendances and television views.

–          Fans of the Super League clubs become disillusioned and form new clubs encouraged by the successes of AFC Wimbledon and FC United.

–          After several seasons the Super League has lost that special Champions League feeling that it was based on. Fans shunned by their now franchised clubs are starting to protest and demand a return to the domestic league structure of the past.

My alternative would be to move the Champions League tournament to the end of the domestic leagues and played within a month like FIFA’s World Cup. Domestic leagues would run earlier and finish early with winter breaks; this would allow clubs to focus on domestic and European competitions individually, which would increase competition.

Barton and Henry feud continues

The war of words between Joey Barton and Karl Henry has continued, with the Wolves man defending himself against claims that he is out to injure fellow players.

The pair clashed in QPR’s 3-0 win over Wolves at Molineux on Saturday, with Barton labelling Henry as a ‘Sunday League player’ and claiming Mick McCarthy must have ‘been on drugs’ when he decided to sign the midfielder.

The FA will not take action against Barton, and Henry has retorted and defended himself against the claims.

“Joey Barton was telling everyone he is on 80 grand a week as usual. That is him. He always does that during the game. Always. He riles a few people up when he says those things and tells everybody how great he is,” Henry told The Guardian.

“It is just embarrassing really. If that is what he wants to do, he can carry on doing it but that is why a lot of people dislike him. He has tried to reinvent his image but it is probably the same old story.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

“I know we had our battle last season. I don’t want to keep going over it. But [on Saturday] they were winning the match. There was no need for him to keep going on the way he does,” he concluded.

[ad_pod id=’qs-2′ align=’centre’]

Have Tottenham every right to smell a rat?

The announcement that the keys to the Olympic Stadium in Stratford are all but set to be handed over to West Ham in favour of Tottenham’s bid will have come as little surprise to most, but the nature of the decision’s release and a few aspects that have come to light since are most troubling.

West Ham were always deemed favourites for the stadium, namely due to their geographical closeness between their existing ground, Upton Park, and the site of the Olympic Stadium in Stratford.

Their bid was in direct contrast to Spurs’ bid. West Ham proposed to keep the running track, a key issue when dealing with the Olympic Park Legacy Company, and have already got sufficient plans in place to make revenue, such as striking a deal that would see Madonna perform at the stadium and an agreement to have Essex play their Twenty20 games at the stadium.

Spurs however, from the outset, were not afraid of rocking the boat. They planned to demolish the stadium, the running track included, and build their own stadium to suit their own needs. As part of their bid, to appease outcry from the world athletics community, they also planned to redevelop Crystal Palace, the current home of UK athletics.

Sources leaked as early as yesterday suggested that the decision was all but made in West Ham’s favour, before the Olympic Park Legacy Company had even reconvened to make a final decision. It has since transpired that the board came to a unanimous verdict. Add into the mix that an 11am press conference had been called in central London for today, only to then be postponed until an hour or so later, and it would appear that the board had already made their mind up as to the victor in this most bitter of pursuits.

Former Spurs Chairman Lord Alan Sugar had this to say on the days events: “I am somewhat outraged that there have been leaks. The OPLC board say nobody should take any notice of them and that no decision has been made, but usually there is no smoke without fire. The leaks about Tottenham only meeting three of the five-point criteria, well, if that’s the case why did they even get past the first rounds of the process? It has not been very well handled.”

Lord Sugar is of course correct, no final decision has yet been made and the OPLC, while a major player in the decision, is an advisory board. The government and Mayor Boris Johnson are expected to rubber-stamp any such preference that the OPLC may have though and the Spurs bid, while not completely finished, does look somewhat dead in the water.

It does beg the question though as Lord Sugar also queried – if Spurs’ bid fell down on two of the major criteria to win the bid, why were they even considered?

The theory doing the rounds now is that Spurs’ bid was doomed to failure from the outset and that it was being used as nothing more than a pawn in negotiations between the OPLC and West Ham over various issues such as keeping the word ’Olympic’ in the stadium name. Even if West Ham do choose to sell the naming rights to the stadium they must now ensure that the word Olympic remains in the title and the OPLC also sought a firm and lasting commitment over the issue of the running track, the main issue of debate between the two bids.

Conspiracy theorists will have a field day over the coming weeks and any such decision will be bitterly contested in another round of who can make the most unpleasant comments towards the other, but it appears West Ham’s bid has been favoured due the club’s stronger links with the community.

If that is the main criteria, then it is hard to argue against, for a football stadium is supposed to be the epicentre of a community, however, it does appear that Spurs have been misled from the beginning to a certain extent. The honesty of their bid and their true intentions has been clear from the start whereas West Ham’s has at times hidden behind smoke screens and emotive rhetoric.

As happened with England’s failed bid to win the rights to host the 2018 World Cup, there appears to be more at work here than meets the eye. It is odd for such a strong and well-structured bid such as Spurs to come up so short with concerns to what the OLPC were looking for.

West Ham have presented a very strong case and perhaps their victory was assured purely on the strength of their bid, little more. From the West Ham perspective, Spurs are simply crying foul because they lost and the fact that West Ham’s bid already has so much in place with concerns to bringing in various revenue streams is certainly commendable. However, in keeping with the mood that has dominated the bidding process so far, this story may have a few twists and turns in it just yet before it is over.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus