Tottenham prepared to pay £26m for Premier League star who Thomas Frank loves

Tottenham boss Thomas Frank is a massive admirer of one Premier League star, and the Lilywhites can see themselves securing a deal for him next year.

Tottenham's rumoured transfer plans for January amid £100m boost

The Lewis family made a statement of intent last week, with Spurs’ ownership pumping £100 million of new capital into the club via ENIC.

On the back of this, it is reported that technical director Johan Lange, CEO Vinai Venkatesham and the new-look Lilywhites boardroom could be gearing up for an active January, and this £100m windfall is just the first of ENIC’s cash injections.

The club’s rumoured transfer plans suggest a focus on bolstering both their attacking options and defensive depth, with several high-profile names linked to a potential move to the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

One of the standout targets is reportedly a proven goalscorer who can provide the clinical finishing Spurs have often lacked.

Strikers like Dušan Vlahović have been frequently mentioned in the media, with the Serbian’s fairly impressive Serie A goal record — having scored at least 14 goals per season since his breakout campaign in 2020/2021 — making him an attractive option to lead Tottenham’s frontline.

Thomas Frank’s managerial record at Tottenham so far

Stats

Matches

11

Wins

5

Draws

3

Losses

2

Points

18

Points per game

1.91

Doubts currently surround Dominic Solanke’s reliability when it comes to fitness and the long-term future of Richarlison, so a new number nine could well be one to watch.

Meanwhile, defensively, Spurs may look to add depth to cope with the physical demands of the Premier League and compete on four fronts.

The winter window could provide an opportunity to bring in experienced defenders who can cover multiple positions, with their over-reliance on star centre-back duo Micky van de Ven and Cristian Romero a real cause for concern.

Ange Postecoglou suffered when either one of the pair were unavailable for large periods last season, and despite bringing in Kevin Danso earlier this year, it is believed that Spurs chiefs are considering another central defender signing in January.

The Lewis family’s fresh backing with new funds provides Spurs with the financial muscle to pursue top targets when the window reopens, and their investments could be seen as crucial steps in Tottenham’s long-term strategy to close the gap on England’s elite.

One of their first orders of business could be the permanent signing of midfielder Joao Palhinha, who’s been a revelation since joining Frank’s side on an initial loan from Bayern Munich in the summer.

Tottenham see themselves triggering Joao Palhinha buy option

The former Fulham star’s imperiousness in the engine room has seriously impressed both on-lookers and Frank, with Sky Germany’s Florian Plettenberg reporting that the noise surrounding Palhinha’s potential indefinite stay is “positive” right now.

The Portugal international’s loan deal includes an option to buy worth up to £26 million, and Tottenham can genuinely see themselves triggering Palhinha’s clause as things stand.

The 30-year-old has been an outstanding addition for Frank, quickly becoming a vital presence in midfield and forming a solid partnership with Rodrigo Bentancur.

His impact was felt almost immediately, with the ex-Sporting CP star’s combative style and energy providing Spurs with the steel and stability they desperately needed.

One of Palhinha’s standout performances came away to Man City, where he showcased his ability to break up play and disrupt one of the league’s most potent attacks. He got on the scoresheet too, as Spurs secured an impressive three points at Eastlands.

Palhinha’s remarkable overhead kick against Doncaster Rovers in the Carabao Cup was also a highlight-reel moment, but perhaps his most memorable contribution thus far was the dramatic last-minute equaliser against Wolves.

His sensational side-footed finish into the bottom corner earned Frank’s men a vital 1-1 draw and kept their early-season momentum alive, with Spurs fans already hoping to see him stay beyond 25/26.

The day Tim Southee beat illness, odds – and Virat Kohli

He shouldn’t have been out on the park at all, but Southee ended up striking the most decisive blow for New Zealand

Karthik Krishnaswamy08-Feb-2020Keep the ball away from his off stump. Stay in that wide channel: sixth stump in name, more like tenth in reality. Make him long to feel bat on ball. Move him across his stumps. Then bowl one at the stumps, with a bit of inward movement. And hope he’s having a slightly off day.Teams try this plan all the time against Virat Kohli. It works sometimes, and doesn’t at other times, but when it does, it’s often memorable: think back to Vernon Philander at Newlands, or Trent Boult at Old Trafford.New Zealand didn’t have Boult on Saturday. Or Matt Henry. Or Lockie Ferguson. All three members of their first-choice ODI pace attack were out injured.The man leading their attack in their stead would have been out too, if New Zealand had any sort of bench left over in the midst of their injury crisis. Illness should have ruled him out, but Mitchell Santner was a few degrees ill-er, and New Zealand could only afford to have one of them sit out. By the end of this day, they would have Luke Ronchi, their assistant coach, come out as substitute fielder.And so we came to the sight of Tim Southee, ball in hand, ghostly expression on face, looking like he’d rather be anywhere but Eden Park.Illness aside, Southee came into this game under a certain amount of pressure – from New Zealand’s fans, certainly, if not from his team management. He had gone for 85 in his 10 overs in the first ODI, spraying the ball around and looking nothing like his best self. Before that, he had bowled two losing Super Overs in consecutive T20Is.Southee didn’t begin particularly well on Saturday evening. He was getting the ball to swing away from the right-handers under the lights, but every so often he was offering up a freebie. Short and wide at the end of his first over, full and wide midway through his second, and Prithvi Shaw slapped both to the off-side boundary.But a well-defined plan can often snap a bowler’s radar back into place, and Southee discovered this when Kohli walked in, after Hamish Bennett had sent back Mayank Agarwal at the other end.Southee had seven fielders on the off side – including, at one point, three slips and a gully – and only mid-on and fine leg on the leg side. To execute the Kohli plan, he would have to be precise with his line and length.And Southee, grimacing between deliveries, clutching his hip every now and then, walking back to his mark pale-faced, was just that. The swing, perhaps unusually for white-ball cricket, was persisting into his third over. Kohli reached out for an outswinger and missed. He drove at the next one and sliced it squarer than intended, towards backward point rather than into the covers.

‘We came to the sight of Tim Southee, ball in hand, ghostly expression on face, looking like he’d rather be anywhere but Eden Park – almost by default.’

At the other end, making his debut, Kyle Jamieson had bowled Prithvi Shaw with an inducker. Now he nearly had Kohli caught-and-bowled, the reflex chance refusing to stick in his left hand. Then he teased Kohli with more wide-of-off-stump bowling. Kohli left two balls alone, and pushed or jabbed the rest into the off side.When Kohli came back on strike to Southee, he moved down the track and across his stumps, to get closer to the pitch of the ball and manufacture a double into the vacant square-leg region. Southee responded with the widest outswinger of his spell, wide enough to make the umpire signal wide.Kohli, continuing to shimmy out of his crease, jabbed the next two balls into the off side, and left the last ball alone.After eight overs, India were 47 for 2 chasing 274. Kohli had negotiated this sort of situation numerous times, but on 8 off 18 without a boundary, he was looking just a touch edgy, just a touch too keen to assert himself. Or this could simply be hindsight arranging events into an easily recognisable shape.Either way, Southee bowled three more balls to Kohli on Saturday evening, and two of them – either side of a single to get off strike – were offcutters angled into the stumps. Kohli missed both of them.It’s rare for Kohli to miss two incoming balls in a row, but that’s what happened at Eden Park. Southee, with a bit of help from Jamieson, had caused a little kink to appear in Kohli’s technique. His eagerness to walk across his stumps was causing his head to fall over ever so slightly, and that, combined with the big gap at midwicket, was causing him to play around his front pad and across the line of the ball. At his best, Kohli would have hit both balls towards mid-on, with a straight bat.On this day, both balls beat his inside edge. The first could have been lbw had the umpire thought so. The second, fuller, seam scrambled in the air, left no doubt in anyone’s mind, brushing the front pad before crashing into middle and leg stumps.This was the ninth time Southee had dismissed Kohli in all international cricket. No other bowler has dismissed him as many times. The moment might have given way to an explosive celebration on another day, but Southee, still under the weather, barely managed a smile as he exchanged weak high-tens with his team-mates.He somehow got through another over, to end with first-spell figures of 6-0-33-1. That could have been that, given his state, but he came back in the 19th over for another spell, New Zealand deciding to bowl him out early and allow him to go off the field for good.This four-over spell was perhaps even better than the first one. The length was a little shorter in deference to the ball’s age – though the swing hadn’t entirely gone away – and to the short straight boundaries, and cross-seam deliveries were interspersed among seam-up balls that continued to wobble this way and that. Kedar Jadhav, batting on 9 off 32, looked to drive one that wasn’t quite pitched full enough, and spooned a catch to cover.Ravindra Jadeja, new to the crease, struggled with the angle across him and the movement from just short of a length. There was a poke and a miss, a couple of nervy jabs into the off side, a wild yahoo after jumping out of the crease, and an educated slash that flew over the slips for four.And then, having bowled 10 out of the first 25 overs of India’s innings, having taken two out of five wickets, Southee dragged himself off the field, all expression drained from his face as his team-mates’ pats rained on his back.

Are big partnerships overrated in T20 cricket?

IPL numbers suggest longer stands are becoming less relevant in high-scoring matches

Shiva Jayaraman28-Sep-2020We probably wouldn’t be discussing this if Rajasthan Royals hadn’t pulled off a heist against Kings XI Punjab in Sharjah. But why did KL Rahul, who is fully equipped to go ballistic like the other batsmen in the match, choose to play within himself and simply turn the strike over to Mayank Agarwal? Surely Kings XI could have done with the extra runs they could have put on the board had their captain scored at the pace he’s capable of?In a match where the other batsmen struck at almost 200, Rahul made a 54-ball 69 at a strike rate of 127.77. ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats gave Rahul a negative value impact for his innings. It wasn’t that he was rusty coming off the long break like some other top India batsmen have been in the league so far. After all, in Kings XI’s previous match in Dubai, a bigger ground than Sharjah, he had put bowlers to the sword with an unbeaten 69-ball 132.ESPNcricinfo LtdSteven Smith played a similar role in Royals’ first match of the season in Sharjah, against Chennai Super Kings, playing second fiddle to a marauding Sanju Samson. Smith showed with a 27-ball 50 against Kings XI that he can score quickly if he chooses to. So why did the two batsmen, who are capable of scoring at the frenetic pace T20 cricket demands from them, play the strike-rotation game?One possible reason could be that they are hard-wired to think in terms of partnerships, which are valued dearly in the longer formats. Coaches and experts, who have played much of their cricket in the longer formats themselves, perhaps share this philosophy too. Team think-tanks might worry about one wicket triggering a collapse, or new batsmen taking too much time to settle, even on flat surfaces.Moreover, teams batting first possibly start their innings with the aim of putting up a score that is for the prevailing pitch and conditions. Batsmen who are otherwise capable of hitting sixes might settle for giving the strike to their partners – the designated hitters in the partnership – as long as the team is on course to achieve that par score. Big partnerships where one batsman is going hard while the other is rotating the strike well are assumed to be good for the team’s cause in all conditions.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe numbers suggest teams are happy for partnerships to follow that model. Data from 94 partnerships in the IPL where both batsmen have contributed at least 50 runs to the stand suggest that it’s rare for both batsmen to play to their striking potential. Only three times in such partnerships have both batsmen scored at a 200-plus strike rate. Both batsmen have struck at 150-plus in only in 36 (38.2%) of the 94 stands, and as many as 58 (62%) of the stands had at least one batsman striking at less than 150.The bat-first numbers are more significant here, since scoring rates in chases are dictated by targets. Out of the 58 partnerships where both batsmen have contributed 50-plus while batting first, 33 have come with at least one of the batsmen striking at less than 150. Nineteen of these 33 partnerships have come in losses.The numbers are more revealing since the 2015 IPL season – a time of increased scoring rates overall – with only four out of 14 such partnerships coming in wins. In contrast, nine out of 13 partnerships where both batsmen went at above 150 have come in wins. These numbers show that partnerships where one batsman scores slowly leave teams vulnerable to not putting up a big enough total while batting first.

The T20 batting landscape is changing rapidly. Good chasing teams now have the confidence to go after targets however big they are. Data from the IPL indicates that a higher percentage of century stands in the first innings (even without the condition that both batsmen contribute at least 50) are coming in losses than they used to. Since the 2018 season, 12 of the 20 century stands that have come while batting first have come in losses. This means 60% of such partnerships have contributed to defeat. In the first four years of the IPL, only eight of the 33 bat-first century stands had come in losses. That’s a swing of 47%. It’s clear then that teams shouldn’t look to build partnerships just for the sake of it.

Should Rohit Sharma take over the T20I captaincy from Virat Kohli?

Lots of people seem to think he should, but they’re wrong to mix success in international cricket with success in league T20

Aakash Chopra26-Nov-2020Rohit Sharma is the most successful IPL captain in history, with five trophies to his name. Anyone who follows his captaincy closely – outsiders like me and players who play under him – vouches that he is tactically astute and that there are few who read the game better than he does. He remains calm under pressure, marshals his troops with a sense of control, and makes the most radical changes to the flow of the game without making them look radical at all.Captaincy consists of two equally important parts: one, the ability to read the game so that you are at least a couple of overs ahead of it (in white-ball cricket), and two, acknowledging your instincts and sticking with them when you’re convinced. A good captain has no ego and is happy to take his leadership group on board for a lot of the decision-making but has the confidence to overrule them if he thinks otherwise.Sharma ticks all these boxes, and while the Mumbai Indians’ success is a lot about their auction strategy and talent-scouting, it is equally about his leadership both on and off the field.ALSO READ: ‘India’s loss if Rohit Sharma isn’t made white-ball captain’ – Gautam GambhirIf he is such a successful IPL captain, wouldn’t it be natural to make him the captain of the Indian T20I team too? If players get picked for India in the shortest format on the basis of their performances in the IPL, why should it be different for the captain?Just that it isn’t the same thing – ever. And to be fair, it shouldn’t be either, unless there’s a captain who’s failing with his playing skills in the format while leading the Indian T20I team.After Mumbai’s fifth IPL title, there was a clamour among some former cricketers to replace Virat Kohli with Sharma as captain in the shortest format. Their argument is that Kohli’s record as a captain leading the Royal Challengers Bangalore is quite poor and that that should be enough to make the change for India too.Sharma has won five titles and has won 60% of all his games as captain of the Mumbai Indians. On the other hand, Kohli’s team has never won the IPL; and RCB have won just about 47% of their matches under his captaincy. The argument against Kohli is that since Sharma not only wins more games but also knows how to win knockout matches, he should be leading India into the next T20 World Cup.Let’s look more closely at Kohli’s returns as captain and then at the merits of possibly making a change.Kohli as an India captain in ODIs has won 72% of his games; in T20Is this figure is about 65%. If we were to further narrow it down in the shortest format, his win percentage goes up to 75% since the start of 2019 – 12 wins from 16 games.To put things a little more in perspective, MS Dhoni is arguably India’s most successful limited-overs captain, with a T20 World Cup, 50-over World Cup and a Champions Trophy title to his name – the only captain in the world to have all three. Dhoni’s win percentage in T20Is and ODIs is about 60%. When you set Kohli’s returns as an India captain alongside Dhoni’s performance, you can’t possibly punch holes in it.

Would you drop proven international performers like Jasprit Bumrah or KL Rahul from the Indian T20I team if they had a poor IPL? The answer is an overwhelming no

While some argue that bilateral cricket doesn’t matter, others say Kohli’s numbers are as good as they are only because India is such a strong team that captaincy does not have much impact on their win percentage. To answer both these reservations: since Kohli hasn’t led in an ICC event in T20Is, we ought to look at his records in bilateral series only. And beating both New Zealand and England in their backyards must count for something. Also, the two ICC events in which he has led India, they have got to the final once and to the semi-final the other time. Those aren’t poor results by any stretch of the imagination. As for the second point, if Kohli is a good captain with a good team under him when he leads India, perhaps it’s the team at RCB that needs changing and not the captain.Of course, winning the trophy is all that matters for a team of India’s calibre, but let’s remind ourselves that that is not easy for even the best captains. While Dhoni won the inaugural Word T20, he led in many more World Cups in the format but couldn’t win the trophy again. Is that a slight on his captaincy skills? Not at all, for that is how it is at the highest level.Going back to the argument about Kohli having a good team under him when he leads India, it’s understandable if some of the blame for RCB’s poor results is directed at him, but what does that have to do with his performance as India captain? Given his win percentage of 47, RCB might not want to continue with him as captain, but maybe they will have him stay on as captain anyway.ALSO WATCH: Kohli or Rohit: Chopra and Gambhir on India’s T20I captaincy (Hindi)It’s important that we understand that we aren’t stakeholders in franchise teams, which will always be run the way their bosses want them to be. They have every right to take the direction that suits their cause, and they are not obliged to share the reasons for their decisions with the public at large. If you don’t like their ideas, stop following them. The India team is different, though. We are stakeholders when we follow India.We, the fans of the sport and former cricketers and experts, ought to learn to separate the two – international and franchise cricket. Indian players must be judged on their performances — whether captaincy or otherwise – for India alone. For example, would you drop proven international performers like Jasprit Bumrah or KL Rahul from the Indian T20I team if they had a poor IPL? The answer is an overwhelming no, because they have been outstanding for India in the T20I format, and that will supersede all franchise cricket.Given that the captaincy role went to Kohli when Dhoni moved on, it’s only fair that he get as long a run as his performances as India captain merit; his lack of IPL success must not come in the way of his chances of leading in his maiden ICC T20I event. The fact that when Kohli took over from Dhoni there was no ruckus about the appointment tells you that Sharma wasn’t really in the contest for the job back then.If Kohli goes on to win the next World T20 and more ICC trophies, it is possible that Sharma might never get a crack at the captaincy at the highest level. While that will be unfortunate, it will be a case of him being born in the wrong era. Amol Muzumdar scored tons of runs, and Rajinder Goel and Padmakar Shivalkar took truckloads of wickets, but all three never got a chance to play for India, unfortunately. And that was because India was blessed with the Fab Four batsmen in Muzumdar’s time and Bishan Singh Bedi and other fine spinners in Goel’s and Shivalkar’s time.As much as it’s about being fair to Kohli (who has won 12 of his last 16 T20Is in charge), it’s equally about being fair to Sharma. If and when the selectors decide to turn towards him to lead India in T20Is, they must give him enough time to build the team he wants to build. Rome wasn’t built in a day, and nor were the Mumbai Indians, and the same will be true for Sharma’s India team.

Lee vs Balaji, Dhoni vs McKay, and a World Cup humdinger

Five great ODIs from India’s past tours of Australia

Himanshu Agrawal24-Nov-2020
VB Series 2003-04, BrisbaneIndia came into this game having lost each of their last 11 ODIs against Australia in Australia, a sequence stretching all the way back to December 1991. But the big names in their batting line-up combined to give them a great chance of ending that streak. Sachin Tendulkar struggled with an ankle injury that he picked up early in his innings, but it didn’t affect his fluency during a 110-run partnership with VVS Laxman for the second wicket. Tendulkar’s dismissal brought in Rahul Dravid, who raced to a half-century off 49 balls despite only hitting one four in that time. He eventually contributed 74 to a stand of 133 with Laxman, who provided the finishing touches and ended on 103 not out, setting Australia a target of 304.Adam Gilchrist and Matthew Hayden began the reply in typical fashion, Australia racing to 46 within the sixth over before Gilchrist fell to Irfan Pathan. L Balaji then dismissed Ricky Ponting and Damien Martyn cheaply, leaving Australia 94 for 3. Hayden calmed them down in partnership with Andrew Symonds and then Michael Clarke, and they were in the ascendancy when Hayden reached his hundred in the 31st over. They needed exactly 100 off 100 when Pathan dismissed Hayden, and wickets began falling regularly even as Michael Bevan scampered along at one end. For once, he would end up unbeaten in a losing chase, with Balaji picking up his third and fourth wickets in the 49th over to put the equation too far beyond Australia’s reach.VB Series 2003-04, SydneyFour days after that win at the Gabba, India nearly shocked Australia again. They had an under-strength top order with both Virender Sehwag and Tendulkar out injured, but another unbeaten hundred from Laxman, and a brilliant 122-ball 139 from Yuvraj Singh, carried them to 296 for 4, with the pair putting on 213 for the fourth wicket.Gilchrist’s hitting made the target look inadequate, and Australia were 73 for 1 after just 9.2 overs when rain began lashing down. When play resumed, Australia had a revised target of 225 in 34 overs. Gilchrist and Ponting extended their second-wicket stand to 126 and brought the equation down to 75 in 78 balls, when Irfan Pathan turned the match by nabbing Ponting and Martyn off successive deliveries. Gilchrist perished to Murali Kartik in the next over, and then Sourav Ganguly joined the party by dismissing Andrew Symonds, Michael Bevan and Michael Clarke, and running out Ian Harvey.Clarke’s dismissal left Australia eight down and needing 15 from 12 balls. It eventually came down to 7 off 3, when Brett Lee cracked Balaji for a big six over wide long-off to shut the door on India.Praveen Kumar and Rohit Sharma celebrate a wicket•AFPCB Series 2007-08, BrisbaneThe journey that would culminate when MS Dhoni lifted the World Cup in 2011 began three years earlier, when he captained a new-look side to a tri-series title in Australia. It was all done without Ganguly and Dravid – who had been dropped – and also the injured Sehwag and Zaheer Khan.India had never beaten Australia in back-to-back ODIs in Australia before this, so when they won the first final in Sydney, history was against them sealing the deal in Brisbane.India chose to bat, and made a sedate start with Tendulkar and Robin Uthappa putting on 94 in 20.5 overs. A run-a-ball 38 from Yuvraj brought urgency through the middle overs, and after Tendulkar fell for 91, Dhoni held the lower order together and hauled India to 258 for 9.Given the strength of Australia’s top order, India would need early wickets to make a match of it, and that’s exactly what Praveen Kumar gave them. Swinging the ball masterfully, he sent back Gilchrist and Ponting in his first two overs, and when he bowled Clarke in his fifth over, Australia were 32 for 3. The game kept seesawing thereafter. Hayden and Symonds put on 89, then both fell in the space of three balls. Then Michael Hussey and James Hopes came together to add 76, before Sreesanth had the former caught behind.That left Australia needing 60 in eight overs, with four wickets in hand. Hopes kept them in it even as wickets kept falling at the other end, and the final over began with Australia needing 13 with two wickets in hand. They couldn’t get Pathan away, though, and he took the last two wickets to seal a nine-run win, leaving Hopes, last out for a valiant 63, disconsolate.CB Series 2011-12, AdelaideFollowing a 4-0 embarrassment in the Tests and a drawn T20I series, India also lost the opening match of the ODI tri-series that followed. They beat Sri Lanka in their next game, before heading to Adelaide Oval for another meeting with the uncompromising Australians.India sent Ponting – who opened the batting, unusually – back early, but a 38 from Clarke set Australia a decent platform which the debutant Peter Forrest and David Hussey capitalised on with half-centuries. A quickfire 39 from Daniel Christian applied the finish, and India were set 270 to win.The chase took off in a hurry with Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir putting on 52 in 9.1 overs. Sehwag, Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma couldn’t build on decent starts, and when Gambhir fell for a gritty 92 in the 35th over, the match hung in the balance, with India four down and needing 92 off 97 balls.The required rate climbed as Dhoni struggled to get going, crawling to 13 off 31 balls. Suresh Raina’s hits kept the equation from becoming too unmanageable, and when he fell for 38 in the 47th over, India needed 31 off 23.It came down to 12 off 4, with Dhoni, batting on 33 off 55 with no boundaries against his name, on strike. Cue one of the most famous hits of Dhoni’s career, launching Clint McKay’s slot ball outside off stump for a 112m six over long-on. The rattled McKay was no-balled for high full-toss next ball, evidence that yet another bowler had blinked first in a high-stakes last-over contest with MS Dhoni.Dean Jones on his way to making 90 in a one-run win over India in the 1992 World Cup•Getty Images1992 World Cup, BrisbaneBoth teams had made jittery starts to the tournament and in a near-must-win match, Australia limped to 31 for 2 in the 11th over, before Dean Jones and David Boon set about rebuilding their innings. They added 71 for the third wicket, with a helmetless Jones showing early intent with a full-blooded six over long-on off Javagal Srinath. Jones enjoyed productive stands with Steve Waugh and Tom Moody as well, before falling 10 short of a hundred in the 48th over.A late collapse from Australia – they lost 4 for 7 in the last three overs – left India needing 238. They lost Kris Srikkanth to a peach from Craig McDermott before rain reduced their target to 236 in 47 overs. Ravi Shastri’s struggle to 25 off 67 balls threatened to suck the momentum out of India’s innings, but they got right back in the game courtesy a fine 93 from Mohammad Azharuddin and quickfire cameos from Kapil Dev and Sanjay Manjrekar.Australia were on top when they ran out Azharuddin and Manjrekar in quick succession, leaving India needing 20 off 12 balls with three wickets in hand. Kiran More and Srinath whittled it down to 13 off 6, and More flicked the first two balls of Moody’s final over to the square-leg boundary to bring it down to 5 off 4. A repeat attempt found More’s middle stump broken, however, and the run-out of Manoj Prabhakar brought it down to 4 off the last ball, with Srinath on strike. He swung Moody high towards long-on, where Waugh, sprinting to his right, put down the catch. With the batsmen attempting a desperate third run to tie the game, Waugh threw to the keeper’s end and found Venkatapathy Raju short of his ground to seal the tightest of Australian wins.

Stats – The many rescue acts of Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah

The pair has aggregated 771 runs in 13 ODIs whenever Bangladesh lost four or more wickets with the score yet to touch three figures

Sampath Bandarupalli29-May-202199 and 74 – Bangladesh’s scores at the fall of the fourth wicket in the first two ODIs against Sri Lanka when Mahmudullah joined Mushfiqur Rahim at the crease. Partnerships of 109 and 87 between them put the hosts in a dominant position on an ever-slowing Dhaka track. The middle-order batters could not deliver for the third time in a row, on Friday, chasing 287.Only three times has the target of 240-plus been chased down at this venue across 20 attempts in the last seven years. However, Rahim and Mahmudullah finished among the top three contributors in the unsuccessful chase, continuing their pattern of holding the fort, and pushing Bangladesh to their maiden series win over Sri Lanka in any format.Rahim-Mahmudullah to the rescueESPNcricinfo LtdThe recent series was an example of what Rahim and Mahmudullah have got used to, as they paired up 13 times in ODI cricket whenever Bangladesh lost four or more wickets with the score yet to touch three figures. They have aggregated 771 runs in such situations, only behind the 915 runs by the Indian pair of MS Dhoni and Suresh Raina. But the Bangladesh pair has a superior average and the same number of fifty-plus stands despite having made five fewer appearances.The Dhoni-Raina pair is ahead of Rahim-Mahmudullah in the list of most partnership runs for the fifth and lower wicket in ODI history. Across 51 innings, the Bangladesh duo together added 1891 runs at 41.10 per dismissal. All four century stands between them in ODIs have been for the fifth wicket, the joint-second most by any pair in the format. The pressure they often deal with might not be evident from the partnership numbers as the average score at the entry point is only 149.4 and no more than one specialist batter to follow them.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe partnership in the series opener was the third time Rahim and Mahmudullah shared a century stand when Bangladesh were four down under 100. Only two other pairs have had as many century stands in these situations – Angelo Mathews with Lahiru Thirimanne of Sri Lanka and Rahim with Shakib Al Hasan.Rahim’s big impactIn all, Rahim has been part of eight 100-run stands in ODIs whenever his team lost four or more wickets inside 100 runs on the board, behind only Dhoni, who was part of 14 such partnerships. Batting at No. 4 post the 2015 World Cup, the Bangladesh wicketkeeper has aggregated 589 runs in 16 instances whenever Bangladesh lost two wickets inside 25 runs on the board. Rahim has the clear edge ahead in terms of runs in this list but has been a consistent feature at No. 4 only from 2017.ESPNcricinfo LtdDuring this period, he scored 2275 runs in ODIs at No.4, standing only behind New Zealand’s Ross Taylor (2755). Though the average in the mentioned situations reads only 36.8, Rahim got two of his eight ODI centuries, including his career-best 144 against Sri Lanka in Asia Cup 2018, after Bangladesh lost two wickets in the very first over. No player batting at No.4 scored more in an ODI innings, coming in when the team score is 1 for 2 or worse.The silent warriorMahmudullah often stays under the radar in a line-up comprising Iqbal, Shakib, Rahim and Mashrafe Mortaza. The first-ever centurion of Bangladesh in the World Cup has got used to rescuing the team from early collapses, ever since he settled to lower middle-order (in 2017). Since the start of 2017, Mahmudullah has walked out to bat with the team’s total has been 132.8 runs at an average, which drops down to 122.8 runs whenever he turns up at No. 6.Coming to bat with four or more wickets down inside 100, Mahmudullah has scored 553 runs across 14 outings in the past four years, averaging 50.3. He played a cricial role in Bangladesh’s road to the knockouts in the Champions Trophy 2017, when he put up a 224-run stand for the fifth wicket with Shakib. In pursuit of a 266-run target against New Zealand, the chasing team lost four wickets for 33 runs, only to be rescued by the twin tons.ESPNcricinfo LtdOnly one player has scored a century during a successful ODI chase batting at No. 6 or lower, coming in with the team total lower than 33 – Jos Buttler, 110* against Australia in 2018 at Manchester when England were 27 for four. The luxury of Rahim and Mahmudullah in the middle order has made Bangladesh a team to beat in their backyard, as they have the best win record in bilateral ODIs at home since World Cup 2015.

Kingston hopes new Sabina Park mural will attract city's youth and tourists

Michael Holding, Chris Gayle, Stafanie Taylor among players showcasing the spirit of Jamaican cricket

Varun Shetty20-Aug-2021About 30,000 people are said to have thronged the streets around Boys’ Town, Kingston, when Collie Smith died in a car accident in England in 1959. Smith, 26, had been travelling with close friend Garry Sobers, who would go on to dedicate a chapter to Smith in his book .”In all my innings, and especially in Jamaica where they so loved Collie, I played with him inside me. Trying perhaps to give him the innings that death had denied him. We had some wonderful innings together. They were beginning to call me a great allrounder. Collie was a greater allrounder than I,” Sobers said.Smith played 26 Tests for West Indies between 1955 and 1959, and was believed to be the only batter to score centuries on first appearance (at 21 and 24, respectively) against both Australia and England at the time. His most important achievement, though, was doing it all coming from Boys’ Town, a neighbourhood that has battled a long-standing reputation for violence and corruption. To his people, Smith was an immortal beacon of representation in cricket.That story, and many others, will be now be represented on a new mural at Sabina Park that aims to capture the spirit of Jamaican cricket, as part of a larger art project that aims to turn Kingston into a “destination city”. Nineteen cricketers are featured on the mural: George Headley, Allan Rae, Alf Valentine, Jackie Hendricks, Easton McMorris, Collie Smith, Maurice Foster, Michael Holding, Jimmy Adams, Stafanie Taylor, Chris Gayle, Marlon Samuels, Marlon Tucker, Jeff Dujon, Courtney Walsh, Patrick Patterson, Tamar Lambert, Dennal Shim and Nikita Miller.”When the administration that I lead took office in 2016, we decided as a policy position, that we would reposition the city of Kingston in the form of a vision, and that was to transform it into a destination city, a tourism city,” says Mayor Delroy Williams.
“The repositioning means that we have to integrate its history – it has a rich cultural history in the arts, music and literature. We are creating spaces for our residents and our visitors, so that they can interact with our culture and history.”Artists represented each player with a portrait, an action shot and Ghanian Adinkra symbols•Deandra Young SangThe mural at Sabina Park follows a wide-ranging do-over of downtown Kingston, a region that had previously become synonymous with rundown buildings and abandoned businesses. For Rosemarie “Rozi” Chung, director at Studio 174, a non-profit arts academy, who led the project, the brief came directly from the Minister of Culture. It revolved around capturing the spirit of Jamaican cricket, and its significance to the population. The mural has a template – one action photo juxtaposed with one portrait of each player against a blue backdrop that sprawls across the wall; but Chung and her team of young artists – Anthony, Tiana Anglin, Cee Jay Carpio, Yanque Yip, and Jordan Harrison – wanted to go beyond simple portraiture.”Cricket is not just a game. It’s a way of being, and we wanted to create it in such a manner that young people could come on board,” Chung says.”We speak about Jamaican culture, so we went [far] back with the research. It wasn’t just creating imagery, but researching a bit about Sabina and some of the symbols we have on the wall reflect that.”The imagery derives from the Adinkra symbols of Ghana, in a bid to reflect Jamaican culture before slavery, Chung says, and a way to get the education system involved.”The fact is the Adinkra symbols are used all over the world and people don’t even realise it. So we put that in as a way of speaking to you about the character. For instance, Stafanie Taylor, what I created there, along with an artist called Delano Macfarlane – her symbol represents strength, beauty, and humility. That’s an example of what the symbols could mean and refer to – taking you beyond a face. Deeper, to describe the person and how they play.”The symbol used for Chris Gayle is illustrative of that – , the king of the Adinkra symbols, that depicts greatness, charisma, and leadership.But beyond their deeper meanings, the symbols also served as visual elements to anchor the art and connect cricketers of different eras, says Anthony Smith, the artist who painted Collie Smith (symbol: , meaning: Affluence, Abundance, Unity), Holding (also ), Walsh ( – Child of the Heavens) and Marlon Tucker ( – Celebration).The Walk of Fame at Sabina Park by the side of the building commemorates players, officials and other legends of Jamaican cricket•Anthony Smith”For those who are not interested in asking the questions, they will see something beautiful, something that not only unites the works across the entire wall, but represents something they themselves can learn,” Anthony says. “It’s not a case where we created these symbols right here on the project. We borrowed them. So what we’re doing is creating some kind of education, so that someone else may use this kind of visual language as a way of spreading the culture.”Discussions on the project began in 2019. The cricket board selected the list of cricketers, and Chung’s team then had to think of the scale of the mural, which she believes it could be among the biggest in Kingston. The involvement of women artists, painting women cricketers in the murals, drew intrigue among young girls as the project went along, say the team members.Representation is at the heart of this project, and one of the major topics the team hopes to create conversation around is racism.”We Jamaicans did, in various forms, oppose the racism in South Africa, and the sport of cricket and our cricket personnel at the time were very vocal against racism in South Africa,” Williams says.The most persistent recent examples of that are the conversations that Michael Holding has been stirring over the last year or so. Holding is one of the cricketers on that wall, and whilst his work on that front isn’t directly reflected here, the municipality hopes that his presence will prompt the public to find out more.”While we didn’t get to speak to the cricketers directly on the topic of racism, we did do a bit of research on what they would have experienced,” says Anglin, the muralist who contributed six cricketers to the wall. “I think that’s why, also, the use of Adinkra symbols would have been important, to show the strength of our culture and our history. And I think that in itself is a silent protest against the whole act and what they would have gone through.”The larger art project in downtown Kingston, with interactive art spaces containing murals of musicians like Desmond Dekker, Millie Small, Jimmy Cliff, and Bunny Wailer, has already shown signs of success – there has been an uptick in business investors downtown, says Williams.Stafanie Taylor is painted with the Dwennimmen symbol, representing strength, beauty and humility•Tiana AnglinIn a cricket-specific context, the ongoing West Indies-Pakistan series should be a start in terms of visibility for this particular project. In the making of the mural, though, there is already a story of one of those legends resonating with the younger people of Jamaica. When the 24-year-old Anthony painted Collie Smith on the wall, he was painting one of his heroes.”He’s my father’s namesake and he also has my surname,” Anthony says. “But not only that, [it’s] what he represented – the community he came from was an area that, at the time, would have been seen as a ‘bad area’. He represented that something bigger can happen, something big, something fantastic to look forward to. And he did it all at a very young age, so he just showed that the youth can stand up to something monumental, and represent the area, and show that something good can come from that space. That’s one thing he did that I found quite heroic.”One thing I realised was that a sense of ownership was created in the people, primarily the passersby. They saw themselves in the work, their behaviour reflected that the work was theirs. It was energising to see that the community is that involved in what is happening in their country.”The immediate next step for the project will be to introduce plaques to provide more information on the cricketers who form a list that spans nearly 80 years of Jamaican cricket. That will form a crucial part in educating younger people in the region, who are likely to know the likes of Gayle, Samuels, and Walsh, but not so much about the rest. Chung hopes this will be the start of a longer project “speaking of other moments of cricket”.”Hopefully with the feedback locally and abroad, we can continue the project. Because there’s so much more to say about cricket, and we are learning at the same time.”The artists will firmly agree that it was a wonderful project and they too needed time to just look at the work. Most of the time, we don’t get to look at the work. We want everyone to come and experience it. It’s a different thing to when you experience it online, because they’re huge, you know? They’re amazing, really amazing,” Chung says.A look at the schedule says that Kingston might have to wait until England’s tour in January next year to become a destination city in the cricketing context. On all other fronts, things seem to be going to plan.

Who are the oldest and youngest players to feature in a T20 World Cup?

Also: what’s the lowest individual score never made in each format of international cricket?

Steven Lynch02-Nov-2021Who are the oldest and youngest players in the current T20 World Cup – and who are the record-holders overall? asked Keith Robinson from England

The youngest man in the current T20 World Cup is the exciting Afghanistan batter Rahmanullah Gurbaz, who was 19 years 331 days old in their match against Scotland in Sharjah. The oldest is Chris Gayle, who’s about a month past his 42nd birthday.The youngest player in any edition of this tournament to date was Mohammad Amir, who was aged 17 years 55 days when he faced England at The Oval in June 2009. Rashid Khan was about four months older when he played for Afghanistan against Scotland in Nagpur in March 2016. The oldest was Ryan Campbell, who was 44 when he played for Hong Kong in the 2016 edition. The oldest for a Test-playing nation was Brad Hogg, who was 43 when he appeared for Australia in March 2014.Five Dutch players were out first ball in their T20 World Cup match against Ireland. Was this a record? asked Sandeep Sachdeva from India

The short answer is yes: Netherlands’ five golden ducks – by Ben Cooper, Ryan ten Doeschate, Scott Edwards, Roelof van der Merwe and Brandon Glover – against Ireland in Abu Dhabi recently was a new record for T20Is. There had been three previous instances of four, by West Indies against Bangladesh in Mirpur in 2013-14 (this included a run-out), New Zealand vs Sri Lanka in Pallekele in 2019 (when Lasith Malinga took four wickets in four balls), and Estonia against Cyprus in Episkopi in July 2021.The record for one-day internationals is four first-ball dismissals in an innings, which has happened three times – by Sri Lanka against Pakistan in Jamshedpur in 1998-99 (one a run-out), Pakistan vs England at The Oval in 2003 (three inflicted by Jimmy Anderson), and Scotland against New Zealand in Dunedin during the 2015 World Cup.The record for a Test innings, as far as can be established (data is incomplete), is also four, by South Africa against England at The Oval in 2017, two of them coming during Moeen Ali’s match-ending hat-trick.What’s the lowest individual score never made in each format of international cricket? asked Cal Bypost via Facebook

At the moment the lowest individual score never recorded in a men’s Test match is 229, followed by 252 and 265. The first score of 238 came earlier this year, by Kane Williamson for New Zealand against Pakistan in Christchurch.In one-day internationals it’s 155 (which is odd since there have been five 154s and six 156s), and 112 in T20Is. No one has yet been out for 93 in T20Is, but Hamilton Masakadza hit 93 not out for Zimbabwe against Bangladesh in Khulna in 2015-16.In women’s Tests the lowest score not yet recorded is 91, in ODIs 126, and in T20Is 85.R Ashwin held the record for the most wickets after 39 Tests•AFP / Getty ImagesI know that Ravichandran Ashwin used to hold the record for most wickets at a certain stage of his Test career – does he still? asked R Narendran from India

The Indian spinner R Ashwin held the record for the most wickets after 39 matches (220; Yasir Shah had the most after 38, with 209) and held the mark until his 65th Test, by which time he had 342 wickets. But although Ashwin took eight in his 66th match, he was joined by Muthiah Muralidaran with 350 after 66. Murali took 11 more in his next Test, and retained the record from then until the end of his career (800 wickets in 133 matches). Other bowlers have played more Tests, but have not approached his wicket haul.I noticed that Brendon McCullum scored two double-centuries in New Zealand’s two Tests against India in 2013-14. Has anyone ever scored three double-hundreds in a series? asked Kerry Watson from New Zealand

Brendon McCullum hit 224 for New Zealand against India in Auckland in February 2014, then 302 – NZ’s first Test triple – in Wellington the following week. This was the 16th instance of a batter scoring two double-centuries in a Test series; Virat Kohli joined the club for India against Sri Lanka in 2017-18. Apart from McCullum, only Wally Hammond (for England vs New Zealand in 1932-33) and Thilan Samaraweera (Sri Lanka vs Pakistan in 2008-09) did it in a two-match series.As so often, though, one man stands alone when you consider this sort of record. Don Bradman hit three double-centuries in the Ashes in England in 1930, when he racked up 974 runs in all, still the record for any Test series. Bradman hit 254 at Lord’s, in what he always claimed was his best Test innings, 334 at Headingley, and 232 in the fifth Test at The Oval. Bradman also hit two double-centuries in three further series – against England in 1934 and 1936-37, and South Africa in 1931-32. For the overall list, click here.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Seddon Park crowd bids Ross Taylor an emotional farewell

The departing hero provided a throwback to his heyday when he hoicked Logan van Beek for six

Himanshu Agrawal04-Apr-2022Standing a step back to get deep in the crease? Yup. A slight shuffle across off stump? Done. Front leg out of the way? Correct. Back leg nearly or fully bent? Right. Bat swing like a broom? Sure. A swipe across the line for six over wide long-on? Why not? Ross Taylor did all of this in a flash when he deposited Logan van Beek over the ropes in his farewell international innings.Turning the clock back, the 38-year-old expertly swung at the ball like he did in his prime, the neat execution an outcome of free bat-swing and a fearless mindset to accumulate quick runs for his side. The shot was a throwback to the days when he swept and swiped spin and pace alike, in the arc between deep midwicket and long-on, at will.The moment the ball landed beyond the fence, there was hope something bigger was to come. The noise that the crowd produced in that spilt second – the screeching, the whistling, and the cheering – was never heard in two-and-a-half hours of play until then. In all, the New Zealand batters hit 23 fours and ten sixes on Monday, but none of them invited a remotely close reaction.Related

  • Stead non-committal on Williamson-Latham split captaincy

  • Report: Young, Guptill, Henry give Taylor perfect farewell

Earlier in the day, it seemed as if Taylor would never walk out to bat. His team-mates Martin Guptill and Will Young had put on 203 for the second wicket, and they looked good to pile on more runs and misery on Netherlands. However, in the 39th over, the stand ended when Guptill gloved a catch behind and ceded the stage to Taylor. Perhaps, no New Zealand supporter had ever wanted a wicket to fall so desperately.And when Taylor finally walked out to bat, it was as if the whole of Hamilton stood still; or at least Seddon Park did. The entire crowd stood on its feet and welcomed their departing hero. Taylor’s team-mates in the dressing room gave him a standing ovation, and Guptill, the man dismissed, chose to stand across the rope just in front of the fence while banging his helmet with his glove to allow Taylor his moment, much like Henry Nicholls had done when Taylor was dismissed in his final Test against Bangladesh in January.That afternoon, Nicholls, who was the next man in, opted to wait in the dressing room to let Taylor walk back and absorb the applause of the Christchurch crowd.And as every deserving legend, Taylor was welcomed by the opposition for his final international match by a guard of honour.

The first runs Taylor scored was a slashed single past point, enough for the crowd to resume their appreciation. And once he sent van Beek over the boundary, they wanted more. Taylor obliged, only for a slower ball from van Beek tricking him into lobbing it into the keeper’s gloves.Once again, Seddon Park had come to a standstill. The Netherlands players patted him on the back one after the other as he trudged back. That tongue of his, famous for wagging when he reached triple-figures, was stuck halfway out; his mother, perched in the stands to see her boy make her and New Zealand proud for one last time, stood with tears in her eyes. No more watching Taylor bat in international cricket; no more having to see him dismissed.And just like that attempted heave over the leg side was pleasing to see one last time. It was just as fitting that Taylor took the winning catch. The stars aligned for him once again. Two months after ending his Test career with a wicket, he finished his ODI career in style. Except that, it were his fingers that twirled in his last Test; and in his final ODI, his tongue.But just before he would get to soak in the winning moment in his final ODI, there was a little teaser that had played out as the match approached its end. With Netherlands nine down and needing an improbable 117 to get from the remaining eight overs, Kyle Jamieson took Taylor’s cap off as if to give the impression that he was about to bowl. However, Tom Latham wasn’t convinced despite Seddon Park going gung-ho for the third time on the day for their man; and perhaps the last time ever.”One of my favourite cricketing highlights of my whole life was seeing you there in the middle with Kane [Williamson] in the World Test Championship final against India, and hitting the winning runs,” Martin Snedden, the NZC chairman, said before presenting Taylor with a traditional Samoan necklace and a collection of his statistics.”I never thought I’d play Netherlands,” Taylor said in his short farewell speech, not forgetting to wishing them best for the growth of cricket in their country, even when it was all about him on Monday. The camera flashed onto his emotional mother, yet again, as he spoke. Just like us, she would miss watching Taylor and his famous hoick across the line to deep midwicket.

Shane Warne gave us so much and he had so much more to give

He was cricket and he was rock ‘n roll too; he was the best of sport and he was the stuff dreams are made of

Mark Nicholas07-Mar-2022

– Bruce Springsteen, “One Minute You’re Here”, from

There was something elemental about Warnie – like the wind and the rain, or the sun. He could be a wild and unpredictable ride and he could be a warm and kindly neighbour. He brought things into our lives that were unique and he illuminated the spaces we occupied; none of us would suggest that we were anything but lucky to stand in that light. It wasn’t quite exclusively his world in which we lived, but it wasn’t far from it.Shane loved Springsteen’s music and especially that most recent album, Letter to You. It finishes with a song called “I’ll See You in My Dreams”, which is a eulogy of sorts to a friend who has passed, and which Shane said made him cry. Now the tears are ours, for the loss of an irreplaceable brother-in-arms.Related

  • There's a Warne-shaped hole in this Ashes

  • Facing Warne: the magic, the theatre, and the whole shebang

  • What Shane Warne's greatest deliveries tell us

  • Shane Warne's state memorial to be held at MCG on March 30

  • The highs and lows of Shane Warne's cricketing career

He loved rock music in general: thus the heading of each chapter of his autobiography with titles such as “Satisfaction”, “Imagine”, “Heroes” and “The Rising”. He would turn up the volume at home, by the pool or in the car and pound it out, singing the choruses as if he were in the crowd at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, the stadium that was his spiritual home. Mostly, he was a man of popular culture but his take on it was rooted in the tradition and memories of the past. No one had better manners nor offered more polite answers to seemingly endless requests – appearances, autographs, selfies, interviews and functions – while always guarding cricket’s history and conscience.The outpouring since the news of his death has stretched far and wide and is still doing so. The Times of London gave him 14 pages but he was front cover in Malaysia too. He was cricket and he was rock ‘n roll too; he was the best of sport and he was the core of aspirational dreams. He fed us the oxygen of the game in the most engaging and fascinating ways, changing perception, inviting debate, encouraging enthusiasm, breathing hope and never surrendering. We owe him so much.”What’s the key to being a good legspinner, Warnie,” was the question. “A lot of love,” came the answer. “What’s the art of legspin, Warnie?” To which he would reply, “The creation of something that isn’t there, mate.”It was my privilege to know him well and to frequently stay with him in Melbourne, in the various houses he loved to trade – up, and down, I should add. I was with him at home in December 2003 during the ban for the diuretic pill he took just prior to the World Cup in South Africa earlier that year. After the first night, I woke early but there was no sign of him. He walked through the door at 7.30-ish, clad in tracksuit and trainers.Everybody loves Shane: Warne and Ricky Ponting are welcomed with rose petals in Lahore ahead of the 1996 World Cup final•Zafar Ahmed/Associated Press”Been for a run?””No mate, been having a bowl at an indoor school out on the edge of town.””But you’re not allowed to.””I know. Wanna come with me tomorrow and have a hit?””Sure.”Later that day, after tennis, at which he was damn good, by the way, I asked him about these early mornings. He said he knew the fella who ran the indoor school and talked him into opening up at 6am so he could bowl for an hour a couple of times a week before anyone else in Melbourne had put the kettle on. The place was locked up again by seven and first arrivals weren’t till eight. For one period of his life, at least, he flew under the radar; albeit reluctantly, for it was during this forced sabbatical that Kerry Packer told him to lie low awhile and sell the red Ferrari. So he did. And bought a blue one.”Did you sell the red Ferrari, son?””I did, Kerry.”Anyway, back to the indoor school. A handkerchief to aim at was okay but a batter was better, and by great good fortune, that man with the willow was me. I borrowed his kit and padded up. As I write, I’m trying to imagine myself there – more than 18 years ago – nervous as a kitten. When Hampshire played the Australians in 1993, he was rested (well, he wasn’t at the game!), so I had never faced him.The first thing that struck me was the aura, even at the start of his eight-pace shuffle and approach. I remember the rhythm of the approach, the power of the delivery stride and the symmetry of the action. I remember the flight of the ball and the hardness as it hit the bat or body: they say some seamers bowl a “heavy” ball, so did Warne. I remember the revolutions, the high bounce off the hard synthetic surface and the need to react quickly and definitively. I was surprised at how fast he bowled and how, when he bowled “up” (above the eyeline), the ball dipped at the last second and panicked the response. It didn’t spin so much off that surface so I asked if it was like bowling at the WACA in Perth. Not really, he said, the ball skids off the WACA pitch, so it’s easier to bat against me there than in here: “In here, Markie, the bounce will getcha…”The King and I: the author with Warne on duty for Channel 9 in 2014•Scott Barbour/Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesThe ball hit the splice a lot and sent a fizzing sensation up the handle and into the bottom hand, so I adapted at each session by playing softer and softer, later and later. I found it very difficult to get down the pitch and meet the ball as it landed and so persuaded myself to play back more. It occurred to me that a better player would manage the shimmy down the pitch with more skill and faster footwork, and that the good sweepers would have to take him on in the way that Kevin Pietersen managed so successfully on occasions.He hit the pad so often it was a joke – that slider! He even tried a few flippers, the stuff of gold. But no wrong’uns – aka googlies – because of his shoulder. On the second morning I goaded him into bowling one and he winced in pain. I mainly blocked because there were so few bad balls, occasionally slogged over wide mid-on and cut backward of point a bit. One or two drives, straight and through mid-off, were highlights. This was a kingdom of days, Warne and me, cutting it as the dawn broke in his home town.I remember thinking how good the really good players must be, the few who made big runs against him – Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara, specifically. I was barely getting a hint of the overall show – just a little side spin, no wear in the pitch or footmarks, no close fielders (though he did set an imaginary field, but of course, fiction is fiction), no mind games, no crowd, no abuse, no TV or radio, no snappers, no reports the next morning, no pressure on the outcome, no representation of your team or country, no backstory, no scoreboard threat, no behind-the-game panic, no Ian Healy or Adam Gilchrist in your ear and so forth.And I very well remember marvelling at the level of skill in what he did and the power with which he did it. I saw at first hand how the 10,000-hour theory rolled out. He was astonishingly gifted at something extremely difficult – and he knew it – and he practised relentlessly to perfect it and rejoiced in taking it to the world.Confuse ’em, control ’em: Warne bowls to Dwayne Bravo in Hobart in 2005•Mark Baker/Associated PressHere is a passage from his autobiography, No Spin, which I wrote with him:

“The art of leg-spin is creating something that is not really there. It is a magic trick, surrounded by mystery and aura. What is coming and how will it get there? At what speed, trajectory and with what sound? How much flight swerve, dip and spin and which way? Where will it land and what will happen? There is no bowler in the history of the game that a decent batsman couldn’t pick if he watched the hand, so a leg-spinner must unsettle that batsman. Every leg-spinner gives the batsmen a clue, some just disguise it better than others. Leg-spinners cannot create physical fear, in the way fast bowlers can, so leg-spinners look to confuse and deceive.

There is, however, an intimidation factor in leg-spin that comes from the batsman’s ignorance and fear of embarrassment. Few batsmen, if any, truly know what I do, so to maintain that mystery I look to develop an atmosphere of uncertainty and, if possible, chaos. It is all about being in control, about winning the psychological battle.”

And there you have it. The reason why, during a year-long ban from all cricket, the master was at work on his craft. Be damned, he said to himself, I love what I do and I’ll do what I love. And when the time comes, I’ll be ready.Goodness, there is so much else we will miss. He was very funny, and great fun. He was naughty but in the best sense, and smart, in the streetwise sense. He made people happy, which is a gift, and he made people stronger with his support and counsel. He was generous and would put himself up for auction at charity events – “An hour’s coaching at Lord’s with Shane Warne for ten people” – and it would sell for a shedload and he’d meet the buyers, charm them utterly, and do double the time with the group they sent along, often longer if they were enthusiastic kids.The artist, the mentor: Warne showing kids the art of spin in London, 2006•Sang Tan/Associated PressHe had friends in high places and friends from the sticks. He learnt to play tennis on the court in Bob Hawke’s backyard and, years later, fired up the pizza oven for Chris Martin and Ed Sheeran to have chill nights in his own backyard; Michael Parkinson and Tim Rice took him out for lunch at The Ivy; Coldplay called him on stage to sing with them during a sellout concert in Melbourne. At Sunningdale Golf Club one day, Sean Connery heard Warnie was putting out on the 17th green and stayed behind an extra 15 minutes just to meet him. He hung out with Dannii Minogue, Jemima Khan and became engaged to Elizabeth Hurley. On Twitter, Mick Jagger mourned his passing.He completely adored his parents – Keith and Brigitte – was a loyal brother and friend to Jason and doted on his three children. The girls – Brooke and Summer – are heartbroken their dad won’t be walking them down the aisle one day. Jackson, his son and closest mate, is in denial, sure that his father will walk through the door tomorrow. Wonderful husband he may not have been, wonderful father he truly was. The Warnes are a fine family. It hurts deeply to think of their pain.There is a place in the story for Simone, his ex-wife, who lived it hard with him and is now living it hard in shock. She is the mother of the children who held him in raptures and was the girl he asked to marry while rowing round in circles on a quick trip to the Lake District in northern England in 1993. The longer he rowed so hopelessly, the funnier it got. And she said yes.Frankly, he has left a lot of folk in pain. He gave so much and had so much more to give. Bloody hell, how we will miss him.So will the tables. He played high-level poker, risked high-level stakes at the roulette wheel, and liked nothing more than a punchy unit or two on the golf course. Each year, his great joy was an invitation to the Alfred Dunhill Links Championship in Scotland, and this last early October he had a run of birdies that saw him fall only a shot short of winning the amateur event with his professional partner Ryan Fox. I promise that had he done so, he would have regarded it as a pinnacle alongside the Ashes.He touched us all: an artist works on a painting of Warne on a Mumbai sidewalk after his death•Rajanish Kakade/Associated PressHe had become a terrific commentator, listening and learning from others and applying his remarkable cricketing intelligence to the stories he was telling. He liked cricket kept simple; he loved the game to fizz and to sparkle, and he believed implicitly that attack was the ultimate answer to defence.He spread a gospel of spirit and enterprise, trusted his intuition, raged against the dullards and refused to believe that anything was beyond him or the teams for which he played. He lived off the “blame the messenger and always get ahead of yourself” mantra that, when you think about it, is how he managed pretty much every situation in which he found himself.He made cricket cool and he made those around him happy. Sure, he had the odd blind spot but, hey, in this portfolio of achievement we can forgive a little stubbornness. So it is that we have come to an end. It seems barely believable that the Warne smile is no more. By 52 years of age, he’d had a hell of a run, living five, maybe ten, lives or more. Every day, in every place, the magic appeared in one form or another and you just had to be lucky enough to be there and have it rub off on you. It’s gone now but better to have loved and lost than not to have known him at all. There will never be another.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus